Saturday, October 25, 2014

Why I Bought a 2012 Mac Mini over the new 2014 Mac Mini

Apple announced a new Mac Mini last week. I had been waiting for the news as my current situation leads me to program at my desk 95% of the time, making a desktop viable, and yet I don't feel I can justify a Mac Pro or the new Retina iMac. And as for a non-Retina iMac, I already have a beautiful Thunderbolt display, so there would be redundancy. So, I quickly bought the best Mac Mini available for my needs, the 2012 i7 quad core. Best Buy still had plenty of stock, but I doubt that will last, and the next day there was refurbished stock at the Apple refurbished store which was quickly gone (and presumably is mostly now on eBay) so I'm sorry I didn't wait.

As to why the 2012 is better for me than the 2014.

First of all, I'm coming from using an Early 2011 MacBook Pro 13.

Geekbench as measured by me on my own MacBook Pro i5 dual core at 2.3Ghz

  • 64-bit Single-Core 2222
  • 64-bit Multi-Core 4819
In retrospect, being someone who makes a living coding, I probably should have gotten the i7 version of this computer. 

Look at the Mac Mini 2012 i7 quad core @2.3Ghz, again measured by me
  • 64-bit Single-Core 3110
  • 64-bit Multi-Core 11998
Primate Labs estimates the Mac Mini 2014 build to order i7 dual core @3.0Ghz
  • 64-bit Single-Core (est.) 3137
  • 64-bit Multi-Coare (est.) 6358
Pretty obviously, the 2012 quad core beats the pants off the 2014 dual core at multi-core and is almost identical at single core. And this is with a 2014 custom build to order that costs $1199 (with a 1TB Fusion Drive and 8 GB of RAM) versus a stock 2012 that costs $749 (with a 500GB spinning platter and 4 GB of RAM). 

I want to recreate the other specs of my MacBook, so I will move my 480GB SSD and 1TB hybrid drive over (I have a 2nd hard drive in the MacBook's optical bay). And I want to upgrade to 16GB. With the 2014, I can't do that. I can't put 2 2½ inch drives in the new mini. I guess I could order a 512GB SSD with the 2014 and void the warranty by installing my 2½ inch 2nd drive, I think. But this would bump the price up to $1499. 

Then there's the matter of the RAM. I have to buy it from Apple with the 2014. Bump the price to $1699.

To summarize.
With 2012 (and 2 drives I already own)
  • Stock i7 quad core $749
  • 16GB of RAM $136
  • OWC 2nd Drive Kit $29
  • 480 GB SSD (already own)
  • 1TB hybrid (already own)
  • Total $914
  • End product: Faster, 1 Thunderbolt port, 480GB SSD, 1TB hybrid, Intel Graphics 4000
If you don't already own the drives, this will be more expensive. 

With 2014 (and 1 drive I already own, which I can apparently install while voiding the warranty).
  • Build to order i7 dual core $1699
  • 1TB hybrid (already own)
  • End Product: Slower, 2 Thunderbolt ports, Intel Iris Graphics, 512GB SSD, 1TB Hybrid
The one thing that I wish I could get is 4K display support. The new Mini has Intel Iris graphics which are not only considerably faster depending on how you use them, but are also capable of driving 3840×2160@30Hz and  4096×2160@24Hz. The 2012 maxes out at 2560×1600@60Hz. As an Amazon Vine member, I get sent monitors for evaluation occasionally, and it'd be nice to be able to accept a 4K display. Regardless, no Mac Apple currently ships is future proof against the inevitable Retina Thunderbolt Display that will ship after Apple/Thunderbolt starts supporting DisplayPort 1.3, so the 2014 Mac Mini will not be driving 5K Retina displays. 

I don't care about the loss of the FireWire port.  I don't care about the improved WiFi as this will be hooked up via Ethernet. Another Thunderbolt port would be nice for driving either 2 largish monitors or getting maximum data throughput, but Thunderbolt is daisy chain able. And presumably, the PCIe SSD in the new Mini will be faster than the SATA III SSD I'll be using. 

Given what I'll be using it for: computationally intensive, non-graphically or throughput intensive Xcode development, the 2012 model was far and away the better value, and I'm almost saddened that Apple couldn't put together the kind of hot rod that a user like myself would find compelling. 

Wednesday, September 03, 2014

On .Net Rocks Talking about the Swift Language

Last week, I recorded an episode of .Net Rocks about what it's like learning Apple's new Swift language. I think it went well enough, although I wish I could go 10 seconds without saying "you know", and I did go into the weeds giving my impressions of what motivates Apple.

An hour is just not long enough for the topic, and we only just did a very impressionistic coverage of the language.

Regardless, I thought it went fairly well, and worth the time to listen to.

Saturday, August 30, 2014

My Thunderbolt Display Started Flickering and Going Blank...

I had a strange experience over the week involving my local, Nashua, NH, Apple Store. It all started when my Apple Thunderbolt Display started flashing black rectangles and then going blank. As it did this with both my MacBook Pro and the family MacBook Air, I figured it was something wrong with the display. So, I booked a Genius Bar appointment.

I boxed up the display and took it to the mall. Sitting it on the Genius Bar, we weren't able to recreate the problem immediately with the Store's Air, so they took it into the back for observation. The next day calling to tell me that the panel had failed which would be an $833 repair, as this would be on a display that I could probably find for $900 if I searched online, and I would end up with a used Thunderbolt Display, I told them to scrap it and set about rearranging my home monitor situation. I have a Viewsonic monitor with an even nicer panel than the Thunderbolt that I could repurpose as my primary monitor, although I was not happy about losing the Thunderbolt's docking capability. 

And here comes the strange part. A couple days later, the Apple Store calls back to tell me that since they had the parts anyway, they had decided to try switching out the motherboard instead of the panel, and the resulting display was no longer showing the failure even after 6 hours of testing. So I could have my monitor back for $185. I jumped at that. I had been missing it. 

At the store, the Genius who took me my display told me the odd story that the original diagnosis of a bad panel was just the worst case scenario, and they hadn't been sure at the time. Which is definitely not what they had told me when I'd told them to scrap it. I had thought the symptoms I was seeing were pretty strange for a bad panel, and I'd argued at the time with the woman on the phone that it might be a bad power supply, and at the time she was adamant that it was the panel. So I had accepted the Store's diagnosis. 

So, I have my monitor back. Time will tell if the repair worked. I'm glad the Apple Store repair people didn't scrap it, and had taken the time to try something even after I had given up hope, but I have to wonder why they gave me such a bum diagnosis in the first place.

 [Update: well I've had it on my desk for a few hours and it's starting to go directly to a blank screen every few minutes, which is different than what I had been experiencing before where it was mainly large black rectangles followed by sometimes going blank . Plugging and unplugging brings it back. So maybe it wasn't the motherboard, or maybe this motherboard is going bad too. Hooking up a spare Thunderbolt cable to the Thunderbolt port on the display allows me to drive the monitor 'backwards', and I have not seen any blanking in a couple hours, so my current diagnosis is that the integrated cable is bad.]

[Update: After several days of driving the monitor 'backwards', I have seen zero problems. So I'll be heading back to the Apple Store to ask them to replace the Thunderbolt cable and give them a suggestion about testing before telling someone their $900 monitor is scrap worthy.]

Thursday, July 17, 2014

Some Old TV Show is Always the Most Recent on My Apple TV

In January, I purchased a copy of the 'Culture Shock' episode of 90 Day FiancĂ©.  And ever since it's been shown as the most recent episode whenever I select the TV Shows section on my Apple TV. Finally got sick of seeing it enough that I investigated, and it turns out that somebody mistyped 01/19/14 as 01/19/24 which means that unless somebody edits it, it'll be the most recent for the next 9½ years.

I contacted iTunes support and they got back to me wanting my order number for some reason when they could have just searched for the problem. Oh well, I hope they fix it.

[Update: after 5 e-mail exchanges, being asked to re-download the show (which made no sense) and 2 consultations with a manager, iTunes tech support let the producers of the show know about the error, and now my Apple TV is showing the appropriate image for the most recent TV show.]

Friday, June 06, 2014

Something in /var/folders is Preventing My Mac from Booting

A couple months ago, my MacBook Pro stopped booting reliably. It would just sit at the Apple screen and spin, sometimes all night. I could use the repair partition to re-install OS Mavericks and get back to work after a couple hours of downloading, installing, but it would get back to this bad behavior the next time I needed to reboot, which thankfully is not often. And safe mode booting didn't help same symptoms, so the problem wasn't in a cache known to safe mode.

I read on the support forums talk about the /var/folders directory which is used by the OS for some sort of caching. So this morning, when my son left my MacBook without its charger and drained it to the point of needing to reboot, I got another hang, and instead of two hours of reinstalling, I booted into the recovery partition, launched the Terminal app, cd into my normal boot partition, found the boot partition's /var/folders and deleted it.

And I then rebooted normally. So something in that folder is hanging up the boot process, I just don't know what.

Tuesday, May 20, 2014

On Making Sure You Test Against the iOS Versions You Support

I am not used to getting 1 star reviews against TV Towers USA. My small niche of RV enthusiasts are usually a happy lot. However, I made the big mistake of pushing an update (I guess the first one was 1.6) which was marked as supporting iOS 5.1 (i.e. the last for the original iPads) without testing against either a device—which I don't own—or the iOS 5 simulator—which Apple no longer provides. And it crashed on first launch, and if it had survived that crash it would have crashed again, and if it survived to finish launching it would have crashed on showing a detail page.

My father, of all people, had an iPod Touch still running iOS 5 that one of my sisters had given him, and he was nice enough to overnight it to me. It's not his favorite device; an iPhone without the phone he calls it.

Crash number one was probably the issue of iOS 5 not handling binaries which include a 64-bit compile. I had fixed that one in TV Towers USA 1.6.2 when I was blindly trying to fix the app.

Crash number two was at the linking stage. My own SVGgh library included a routine to build up an attributed string version of an SVG path and it had included a reference to the NSForegroundColorAttributeName constant string. Which wasn't available under iOS 5 and caused the app to exception out during launch with a symbol not found error. It isn't even used in this app, but the linker doesn't know that.

Crash number three was that some of my xibs were marked to be of the 6.0+ format instead of 5.0+ format.

And crash number four was that the table data source in the tower detail pane was using the category on NSIndexPath that returns an item instead of the archaic row property. This is a bit of syntax sugar made for use with UICollectionViews, so it, of course is not available under iOS 5.

Everyone of these issues was quickly fixable. And I failed my users by not keeping track of my supported OS versions and at a minimum running through the app before overwriting their existing, working copy.

And, I still don't have an iPad running 5.1.1, so I will just have to pray that there is nothing in the small amount of iPad only code with some similar present for me.

Sunday, May 11, 2014

On Dropping Support for the Original iPad

As an iOS developer, I'm often forced by my development tools to make support decisions. Xcode running on OS X 10.9 no longer allows me to run the iOS 5.1 simulator. Nor will it build an iOS app that simultaneously generates 64-bit instructions and supports iOS 5.1. Therefore, the version of TV Towers USA I just submitted for review (1.6.2) will be the last thing I'm likely to ever write which will run on the original iPad which maxed out at iOS 5.1.1.

I think the decision to limit the original model to 256 MB of RAM turned out to be a poor one on Apple's part as it shortened its usable lifespan hugely. If it had shipped with 512 MB, it would likely have gotten at least to iOS 6.  As it is, the last time I touched an original iPad, I was struck by how unresponsive it was compared even to my iPad Mini. Giving customers such a poor experience is not something Apple usually does, and I hope they've learned their lesson.